The Battle of Verdun, taking place from 21 February to 18 December 1916, is recognized as one of the most extensive, harrowing, and defining confrontations in military history. This engagement between the German and French armies on the Western Front did not revolve around the occupation of vast territories, but rather the desire to break the opponent’s morale and capacity to fight. The operational goal, articulated by German Chief of the General Staff Erich von Falkenhayn, was to “bleed the French army white” by compelling the French command to defend a point of both symbolic and practical importance.

Right: During the Battle of Verdun, April-June, 1916. French soldiers crawling through their own barbed wire entanglements as they begin an attack on enemy trenches. Source: War History Network license. Click to enlarge.

The outcome was a ten-month ordeal of endurance set amidst the fortifications and woodlands of Verdun, forever altering the character of World War I. This analysis provides a comprehensive exploration of the battle’s historical underpinnings, principal phases, the evolution of strategies, and the repercussions endured by both the warring armies and the broader conflict.

Historical Context and Strategic Imperatives

Following rapid maneuver warfare in 1914, the Western Front stagnated into a complex system of trenches by late 1915, stretching from the North Sea to the Swiss frontier. The resulting attrition wore down armies and resources, intensifying the search for strategic solutions. Erich von Falkenhayn, having witnessed the futility of breaking entrenched Allied lines through direct assaults, devised an alternative: to exhaust the French through continuous, focused assault on a site of national prestige and defensive necessity. According to Falkenhayn’s private memorandum to Kaiser Wilhelm II in December 1915, the objective was not outright conquest, but the systematic destruction of the French army through carefully orchestrated attrition.

Verdun, with roots reaching back to Roman antiquity and a proud legacy as a bulwark against invasion, was selected both for its emblematic significance and its vulnerable position within the French defensive system. The tightening of the salient and the partial disarmament of the Verdun forts in 1915, as French high command redistributed artillery to more active sectors, rendered the area especially susceptible to a determined offensive. The German Fifth Army, commanded by Crown Prince Wilhelm, received orders to commence the operation—codenamed Unternehmen Gericht (Operation Judgment)—on a carefully chosen, narrow sector.

On the French side, Commander-in-Chief Joseph Joffre initially relegated Verdun to a quiet sector status, placing greater emphasis on preparations for a major joint Anglo-French attack on the Somme. Although the elaborate fortress ring surrounding Verdun had staved off sieges for decades, French leadership mistakenly believed the era of fortress warfare to be over, a conviction reflected in the diminished garrisons and artillery resources. The French oversight was quickly exposed by the unprecedented scale and intensity of the German advance in February 1916.

Key Phases and Military Operations

The Initial German Assault (February 21 – March)

The German offensive opened at 7:15 a.m. on February 21, 1916, with what, at the time, was the largest and most meticulously prepared artillery bombardment in history. Over 1,200 guns, ranging from field pieces to mammoth siege howitzers, fired more than a million shells along a front of less than 20 kilometers. According to German records, the objective was to completely obliterate French defensive lines and repress any possibility of organized resistance.

Right: The Battle of Verdun, 1916. French officers working on their maps and reports in a heated dugout near Verdun on the Western Front. Source: War History Network license. Click to enlarge.

German stormtrooper units, specially trained in infiltration tactics, advanced behind a creeping barrage, bypassing strongpoints and swiftly attacking French trenches. Within days, German troops captured several pivotal positions. By February 25, Fort Douaumont—considered the keystone of the Verdun defenses—was taken by a small German raiding party amid confusion and thin French defenses. Its loss had enormous symbolic and practical consequences, shaking public confidence and compelling immediate action from the French High Command.

The French initially responded in disarray. Yet on February 24, General Philippe Pétain was appointed commander at Verdun, ushering in a more systematic and resilient defense. Pétain recognized the existential stakes, galvanizing both military and civilian resolve with the pronouncement: “Ils ne passeront pas!” (“They shall not pass!”). To maintain the garrison at Verdun under relentless pressure, Pétain established the Voie Sacrée (Sacred Way), a vital supply route kept open under almost constant artillery harassment. Over 3,000 vehicles traveled the Voie Sacrée daily, ensuring a continual flow of men and materiel into Verdun, in what would later be cited as an extraordinary feat of wartime logistics and discipline.

The Widening of the Front (March – June)

When German progress stalled east of the Meuse due to determined French resistance and counterattacks, Crown Prince Wilhelm’s army sought to shift the balance by opening a second front to the west of the river. The battles for Le Mort Homme (Dead Man’s Hill) and Hill 304 soon became emblematic of the ordeal, with both sides contesting every ridge, copse, and trench line. The intensity of artillery exchanges reshaped the landscape: forests were pulverized, villages annihilated, and the ground was churned into an unrecognizable expanse of shell craters and muddy wasteland.

The drawn-out fighting was characterized by high casualties for minimal territorial gain. French and German units often rotated through the lines, but the fighting left little respite, as fresh divisions were quickly enveloped in the storm of battle. General Pétain, recognizing the unsustainable losses of prolonged continuous engagement, implemented the “Noria” system, rotating units into and out of Verdun to distribute the burden. Nearly 70 percent of the entire French army would pass through Verdun’s firestorm at some point in 1916—an experience that would indelibly shape the character and psyche of the French military.

Eye-witness accounts offer vivid documentation of the ordeal. Lieutenant Louis Barthas described the ground as “nothing but shell holes, shattered trees, and pieces of men,” while chroniclers such as historian Alistair Horne later wrote, “Nowhere was suffering greater and nowhere, too, was the absurdity of this attritional arithmetic so clear as on the slopes of Dead Man’s Hill.”

The Final German Push and the French Counter-Offensive (June – December)

German forces renewed the assault in June 1916, capturing Fort Vaux following a heroic eight-day defense by Commandant Sylvain Raynal and his small garrison, which had endured thirst, poison gas, and ceaseless attacks in subterranean galleries. Despite these gains, the broader campaign reached a strategic impasse. Two critical developments outside Verdun influenced German calculations: on the Eastern Front, General Alexei Brusilov’s offensive inflicted severe losses and diverted German divisions eastward; on the Western Front, the start of the massive Anglo-French attack on the Somme absorbed German manpower and resources.

Right: Underground fortifications at the Battle of Verdun, 1916. One of the subsurface chambers in fortified Verdun was used as a hospital. The little dog in the foreground refused to be separated from his wounded master. Source: War History Network license. Click to enlarge.

With the German initiative blunted, French command sought to regain lost ground. General Robert Nivelle, succeeding Pétain at Verdun, marshaled fresh divisions and instituted sophisticated artillery tactics—including concentrated rolling barrages that preceded infantry advances with devastating effect. French troops under General Charles Mangin reoccupied Fort Douaumont on October 24 after days of fierce combat, followed by the recapture of Fort Vaux in early November. The French regained nearly all territory lost since February by mid-December 1916, effectively concluding the battle as a tactical and psychological victory.

Cost, Impact, and Legacy

The statistics of Verdun are sobering and unparalleled. Scholars estimate combined casualties—killed, wounded, and missing—at between 700,000 and 900,000 men. French losses are commonly cited around 377,000, including approximately 162,000 dead, while the German army suffered around 337,000 casualties, including 100,000 to 120,000 dead. The human cost extended far beyond the battlefield: the psychological trauma endured by survivors prompted French authorities to recognize the newly coined term “shell shock” for mental collapse under fire. The battle also introduced innovations such as the widespread use of phosgene gas and the deployment of new artillery techniques, including deeper and more coordinated barrages that would shape military doctrine thereafter.

Major General Sir John Charteris, the British Chief of Intelligence, famously observed, “Verdun is not so much a battle as a massacre… a struggle of flesh against steadily mounting machinery.” The destructive power of industrial-age weaponry—the relentless artillery, the machine gun, and poison gas—proved decisive factors in this new age of warfare, setting precedents for the remaining years of the conflict.

Strategically, the German objective—to shatter French morale and force a negotiated peace—ended in failure. German casualties rivaled those of their opponents, and the attritional logic that underpinned Falkenhayn’s strategy undermined both armies without leading to a conclusive result. The dismissal of Falkenhayn in August 1916 and his replacement by Hindenburg and Ludendorff marked a shift towards total war and increased reliance on attritional offensives elsewhere on the front.

For France, the legacy of Verdun was equally complex. The defense of Verdun became a symbol of national unity and sacrifice—a narrative invoked in public remembrance and commemorative ceremonies, notably at the Douaumont Ossuary, where over 130,000 unidentified soldiers are interred. Yet the ordeal also left a lingering sense of trauma, caution, and defensiveness in French strategic thought, profoundly influencing military planning and political discourse in the postwar years.

Right: First World War trenches, Butte De Vauquois, Verdun, France. Modern day. Source: War History Network license. Click to enlarge.

The experience and lessons of Verdun were instructive, albeit costly. Military doctrine evolved to incorporate lessons on logistics, rapid troop rotation, centralization of artillery fire, and the need for greater flexibility in command structures. The French adaptation of the rolling barrage, as refined by Nivelle, was later employed—albeit without full success—during the Nivelle Offensive in 1917.

Implications for World War I 

The Battle of Verdun altered not only the course of World War I but also the methods and philosophies guiding twentieth-century warfare. It exposed the limitations of attritional campaigns and the folly of underestimating the defender’s resilience in prepared positions. Its staggering casualties became a touchstone in international memory, reinforcing a sense of war-weariness and skepticism regarding offensive operations among both military professionals and the wider public.

On a broader scale, Verdun exacerbated the mutual exhaustion evident by 1917, setting the stage for the further bloodletting of the Somme and Passchendaele. Political leaders in France and Germany faced mounting pressure to justify escalating losses to their respective populations. The French “Verdun spirit”—a blend of patriotism, sacrifice, and grim determination—helped to sustain morale, but also cemented a culture of remembrance that shaped national identity in the interwar period.

In the decades following the war, Verdun became synonymous with collective suffering and reconciliation. Ceremonies at the Douaumont Ossuary and the annual lighting of the lanterns on the battlefield underscored both the tragedy of the conflict and the shared commitment to peace in Europe.

Bibliography

"The Battle of Verdun – Mémorial De Verdun." Mémorial De Verdun. Accessed November 7, 2022. https://memorial-verdun.fr/en/ressources/la-bataille-de-verdun.

Beckett, Ian F. The Great War: 1914-1918. London: Routledge, 2014.

Chamberlain, U.S. Army, Major Robert. "The Mud of Verdun: Falkenhayn and the Future of American Land Power." Army University Press Home. Accessed November 10, 2022. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20160831_art015.pdf.

Ferguson, Niall. The Pity of War: Explaining World War I. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

Leonhard, Jörn. Pandora’s Box: A History of the First World War. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018.

Lloyd, Nick. The Western Front: A History of the Great War, 1914-1918. New York: Liveright Publishing, 2021.

Meyer, G. J. A World Undone: The Story of the Great War, 1914 to 1918. New York: Bantam, 2007.

Schofield, Hugh. "Verdun: France's Sacred Symbol of Healing." BBC News. Last modified May 28, 2016. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36372478.

Stevenson, David. 1914-1918: The History of the First World War. London: Penguin, 2004.

Strachan, Hew. The First World War: Volume I: To Arms. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

"Verdun, 1916." World War I Centenary | Continuations and Beginnings. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://ww1centenary.oucs.ox.ac.uk/space-into-place/verdun-1916/.